Re: user competency problems

From: George Sukenick <g-sukenick_at_ski.mskcc.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 14:01:06 -0400

Interesting topic.

My researchers use the NMR daily so little refresher
training is necessary.

I provide approx. 2 hours individual training at the start for
learning protocols and performing simple 1-D Proton/Carbon/Dept.

They are encouraged to come back for more training refresher or new training -
it takes time, but I'd rather people using equipment properly than
trying to correct problems in the future which would take even more time.

I require that every new experiment or use of a different spectrometer
requires further training, and I try to cover a little extra
material than what is needed each time.


Interesting - we talk about how users should not use the NMR as a black
box (which I agree, but to there are many levels of gray here).
I remember not to long ago that in order to use a computer,
one needed to know boolean logic, programming.
   If you were going to open up a computer to
install something, you'd better have some EE behind you.

Now most computer users have no idea how a computer works-
even on the block diagram level,
and people who know know to put a few boards into slots think they
know how to "build a computer".
Received on Wed Apr 12 2006 - 14:14:22 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sun Jun 11 2023 - 14:15:39 MST