AMMRL: Bruker AU vs Python implementation of XCMD?

From: <norman.chu_at_piramal.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 16:07:31 +0000

Hi all,

I'm trying to refine an AU program I wrote last year to automatically run through a pre-set shim routine and save it to the IconNMR shim file. It's a bit overkill but a time saver to just run it every week after hours instead of interrupting normal operation.


GETCURDATA
RGA
XCMD("topshim z6 tunea convcomp");
XCMD("topshim 3d tunea convcomp");
XCMD("topshim z6 tunea convcomp");
XCMD("wsh IconNMRShimSet.02");
ZG
QUIT


Now my question is this: in anyone's experience does the AU version of XCMD pass the result of the command? The python version of XCMD has a .getResult() function ( ie: result = XCMD("topshim...").getResult() ).

Ideally what I'd like to do is set it up so that the result is automatically appended to the audit trail of the file with AUDITCOMMENTA, but I'm unsure if XCMD passes any result back.



Thanks & Regards,
Norman Chu
________________________________

Norman Chu
R & D Chemist
Torcan Site

Piramal Healthcare Limited<www.piramalpharmasolutions.com>
110 Industrial Parkway North
Aurora, Ontario, Canada
L4G 3H4

Direct +1 905 727 9417 x 327
norman.chu_at_piramal.com<mailto:norman.chu_at_piramal.com>


[cid:image001.gif_at_01D20E76.D60642B0]

________________________________


This communication may contain information that is proprietary confidential or exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient please note that any other dissemination distribution use or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Anyone who receives this message in error should notify the sender immediately by telephone or by return e-mail and delete it from his or her computer.




Received on Wed Sep 14 2016 - 06:07:36 MST