Some years ago, in User Manager IconNMR configuration, I removed $DATE
under Data set name. This way a user will be forced to provide a name,
usually initials followed by a number or experiment name as Clemens
suggested. I make sure they dont use special characters or leave spaces
in file names.
About searching, since SGIs I have used :
find /v/data/user/nmr/ABC*/*/pdata/*/ -name "title" -print -exec cat {}
\; > junk
Still useful, as our Windows TS data is archived into a disk which is
mounted under Linux PCs.
Abil
On 26/10/2015 19:05, Craig Butts wrote:
>
> Hear hear Ken. I'd add to the list with:
>
> Non-NMR software has no hope of looking inside the data for
> information to help the searcher. For example, if we archive the data
> after publication the numeric file system is simply obstructive for
> searching without TS.
>
> And ICON gives no capability to enact Clemens' workaround.... This is
> especially annoying as ICON is becoming increasingly applicable and
> flexible for day-to-day operation (and non-routine e.g. INSIGHT-MR?).
> We do nearly everything through it...
>
> Craig
>
> On 26 Oct 2015 6:23 pm, "Kenneth Knott" <kknott_at_vt.edu
> <mailto:kknott_at_vt.edu>> wrote:
>
> Thanks everyone for the suggestions and input.. But I think I've
> found a correlation. The people who aren't too bothered by the
> Bruker data system are those using Topspin and it's included
> browser to process their data.
>
> Unfortunately, many of us process our data off the instrument
> using alternative means. We, here at Virginia Tech, use Mnova to
> process our data for a number of reason. The first being we find
> it to be superior to all others in processing. But also for a
> number of other reasons.
>
> 1) Users our trained on one processing software package in a
> multiplatform environment (Mix of Burker and Agilent/Varian sytems)
> 2) NUS processing is included (for free) and far superior (much
> faster) to Topsim
>
> In any case, when processing outside of Topshim you rely on the
> file. system to describe your data sets. Here is where Topshim
> fails miserably...
>
> 1) Exp numbers for folders is wholly undescriptive...
> 2) Even inside the folder, one cannot tell at a glance what the
> experiment is outside of 1D or 2D
>
> Sure there are ways around this once the data is loaded into Mnova
> using titles, but Bruker Topspin falls far short in this regard
> and I'm astonished that you cannot give the experiment folders any
> kind of descriptor.
>
> Thanks again for the help.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Kenneth Knott <kknott_at_vt.edu
> <mailto:kknott_at_vt.edu>> wrote:
>
> So one thing that has always frustrated me about Topspin is
> that is saves all folders simply by the experimetn number.
> This gets very difficult to keep track of when I've got a
> suite of experiments or add to them over time.
>
> It seems to me that there must be a way to alter this to save
> perhaps by experiment number AND parameter set.. for example
> 10-C13CPD or 20-PROTONRO, etc...
>
> Can this be done? If not, how do you get around this issue?
>
> I have found the bruker 'hotline' to be less than helpful with
> issues such as this...
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Ken Knott
> Department of Chemistry
> Analytical Services
> Virginia Tech
>
> (540)267-6502 <tel:%28540%29267-6502> (Cell)
> (540)231-0885 <tel:%28540%29231-0885> (Office)
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ken Knott
> Department of Chemistry
> Analytical Services
> Virginia Tech
>
> (540)267-6502 <tel:%28540%29267-6502> (Cell)
> (540)231-0885 <tel:%28540%29231-0885> (Office)
>
Received on Tue Oct 27 2015 - 08:30:39 MST