AMMRL: More fun with ARX

Piotr Dobrowolski (piotr.d@usu.edu)
Tue, 6 Nov 2007 14:23:36 -0700


--_000_58EDC62766E58048BC1BE7B4783DE1F70428DA73exchgbe02aggies_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,
It seems that our problem with tuning of the ARX-400 was related to overhea=
ting of the Aspect 3001. We discovered that in this unit BOTH fans were dea=
d. We had replaced the fans, the process controller, the MCI board, and som=
e cables. After that everything appeared normal (for a moment). We could lo=
ck/shim, tune and run acquisition (both high and low fqcy channel). Then we=
 decided to check if our old boards were still good, starting with the proc=
ess controller. After swapping these boards we lost lock signal. We switche=
d back to the new one but the signal was still gone. It is quite surprising=
 - so far lock was one of the few functions that were always working. Bruke=
r Service Center suggests a problem with the acquisition interface board (a=
lso inside the Aspect 3001 box - possibly damaged by overheating and sudden=
ly dying). Hopefully replacing of this part will fix the lock but I am not =
really convinced. Please send me your comments/ideas/suggestions.
Thank you,
Piotr


Piotr Dobrowolski Ph.D.
NMR/EPR Manager
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
Utah State University
0300 Old Main Hill, Logan UT 84322-0300
telephone: 435 797-1673
fax: 435 797-3390
http://www.chem.usu.edu/pages/facilities/nmrfacility.html


--_000_58EDC62766E58048BC1BE7B4783DE1F70428DA73exchgbe02aggies_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



















Hi,

It seems that our problem with tuning of the ARX-400 was related to overheating of the Aspect 3001. We discovered that in this unit BOTH fans w= ere dead. We had replaced the fans, the process controller, the MCI board, and = some cables. After that everything appeared normal (for a moment). We could lock= /shim, tune and run acquisition (both high and low fqcy channel). Then we decided = to check if our old boards were still good, starting with the process controll= er. After swapping these boards we lost lock signal. We switched back to the ne= w one but the signal was still gone. It is quite surprising – so far lo= ck was one of the few functions that were always working. Bruker Service Center suggests a p= roblem with the acquisition interface board (also inside the Aspect 3001 box ̵= 1; possibly damaged by overheating and suddenly dying). Hopefully replacing of this part will fix the lock but I am not really convinced. Please send me y= our comments/ideas/suggestions.

Thank you,

Piotr

 

 

Piotr Dobrowolski Ph.D.

NMR/EPR Manager

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry

Utah Stat= e University

0300 Old Main Hill, Lo= gan UT 84322-03= 00

telephone: 435 797-1673

fax: 435 797-3390

http://www.chem.usu.edu/pages/facilities/nmrfacility.html

 

--_000_58EDC62766E58048BC1BE7B4783DE1F70428DA73exchgbe02aggies_--