AMMRL: upgrading to topspin3.5pl5

From: Letitia Yao <letitia_at_nmr.chem.umn.edu>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 13:58:45 -0500 (CDT)

Hi all,

I changed the subject line since we're not just talking about shimming
anymore.

Regarding updating to 3.5pl5, we also had to add in the power levels (for
power check) and save all the atmm positions for all non-standard nuclei
that we had set up in 3.2.

I'd be curious to know if anyone else is having problems with the
temperature control not working with a liquid nitrogen evaporator/dewar.

----------------------
Letitia J. Yao | letitia_at_nmr.chem.umn.edu
NMR Laboratory | http://nmr.chem.umn.edu
Department of Chemistry | (612) 625-8374 (office)
University of Minnesota | (612) 626-7541 (fax)

On Thu, 5 May 2016, Charles Fry wrote:

> We just updated to 3.5pl5 yesterday, and had to re-add a number of "custom"
> entries we had in in prosol, in particular for adiabatic pulse setups.  We also
> noted that a variety of other standard pulse types were changed, in all cases we
> saw the pulse lengths were longer.  Calibrations (power levels) were OK.
>
> Also had to re-add solvents (e.g., CD3OH) and solvent changes we had made (e.g.,
> to toluene-d8).  So something has changed that made this update harder to
> complete than earlier updates.
>
> Otherwise, everything seems to work ok (as best we can tell at this time).  Upps,
> forgot that one home-built au is not working, but haven't looked into the problem
> yet.  It worked fine in TS 3.2.  Have not had problems locking various solvents.
>
> Charlie
>
>
> On 5/4/2016 3:52 PM, Michael Strain wrote:
>
> We've had similar experiences with Topspin 3.5pl2 and 3.5pl4, but not
> earlier versions.
>
> --Mike
>
>
> -----------------------------
> Michael Strain, PhD
> Director, CAMCOR NMR Facility
> University of Oregon
> Eugene, OR 97403-1253
> mstrain_at_uoregon.edu
> 541-346-4605 office/lab
> 541-556-4077 mobile
> http://nmr.uoregon.edu
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 3 May 2016, Paul White wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
> Thanks for bringing this up! I am recently having the
> exact same problem as well. It locks out most of the
> digital BSMS and to reset things back to normal I hard
> restart the BSMS/2 followed by "cf". For some reason it
> also prevents a soft BSMS shutdown from succeeding, gives
> the error the ELCB is unresponsive and it loses the
> heartbeat for the BSMS.
>
> It also happens whenever I try to use new solvents that I
> create using edsolv or edlock...even when the new
> solvents are just copy/paste of existing generic solvents
> but renamed!
>
> Are you using TopSpin 3.5 pl 5? I have not had this
> happen with TopSpin 3.0 or TopSpin 3.2 but when we
> upgraded it started happening with MeOH-d4. Maybe it's a
> firmware issue?
>
> I would love to hear the responses you receive to this.
>
> Sincerely,
> Paul
>
> Dr. Paul White
> Institute for Molecules and Materials
> Radboud University Nijmegen
> +31 (0)24 365 2959
> P.White_at_science.ru.nl
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 5/3/16 12:28 AM, John N Glushka wrote:
> I?m new to Bruker, and just had an error trying
> to use topshim with MeOD-4. It refers to the
> use of the shaped pulse in the topshim1d
> pulseprogram used for methanol and states
> that SP0=0.0  and is too short and should be
> at least 0.25us.  We have used methanol in
> the recent past without a problem, and so I
> don?t understand why this parameter is now
> causing problems, and how one can fix it. 
> Possibly related to this was an earlier error
> during locking referring to BSMS control;
> lock key wasn?t valid. I reset the ELCB which
> seemed to clear that up.  Any suggestions
> would be welcome-
> thanks,
> John
>
>
>
> John Glushka
> Complex Carbohydrate Research Center
> University of Georgia
> 315 Riverbed Rd.
> Athens, GA 30602
> glushka_at_uga.edu
> 706-542-4483
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Fri May 06 2016 - 08:58:17 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Mon Jun 19 2023 - 17:44:28 MST